PRIČE

KAKO JE DISCIPLINSKA PRIJAVA SUDIJE PROTIV ADVOKATA MIRNESA AJANOVIĆA – PRESUDILA SUDIJI ŠEJLI ĆATIĆ

22 Novembra, 2025

Ili: Kako je pokušaj ušutkivanja postao dokaz protiv onog ko je pokušao da ušutka.

KADA DISKREDITACIJA POSTANE AUTOGOL – il’ što bi narod rekao: kada sila udari u glavu

Postoje prijave koje imaju pravnu težinu.
Postoje prijave koje imaju moralnu težinu.
A postoji i prijava sutkinje Šejle Ćatić – koja je imala samo jednu težinu

– težinu potpune besmislenosti.

Nakon prigovora advokata Mirnesa Ajanovića od 58 stranica na disciplinsku prijavu sutkinje Šejle Ćatić – Regionalna advokatska komora Tuzla je Rješenjem od 20 stranica broj 5-DT-031/25 jasno napisala:

„PODNESENA PRIJAVA JE NEOSNOVANA.“

Ali to nije sve.

Ovo rješenje predstavlja vjerovatno najveći pravosudni šamar pokušajima ušutkivanja advokata od strane sudija u posljednjih najmanje 20 godina — tačnije, od famozne „pravosudne reforme“ iz 2003. godine.

Upravo zato ovaj tekst nosi naslov koji zaslužuje:
jer se pokušaj udara na advokata pretvorio u najjasniji pisani dokaz o tome ko je koga pokušao disciplinirati – i ko je na kraju disciplinirano pao – ravno na nos.

KLJUČNI CITATI KOJI SU SRUŠILI ŠEJLINU PRIJAVU

Iz rješenja, izdvajamo dijelove zbog kojih će ovo rješenje ući u pravosudne udžbenike:

Ne postoji niti jedan jedini dokaz

„Ne proizlazi niti jedan neposredan dokaz da je prijavljeni advokat autor spornih objava na društvenim mrežama ili portalima.“
(str. 12)

Advokat Mirnes Ajanović nije ništa objavio, dijelio, komentarisao

„Tokom provjere navoda nije pronađen niti jedan trag da je prijavljeni advokat lično objavio, dijelio ili komentarisao taj sporni sadržaj.“
(str. 12)

Sedam puta ponovljeno: tvrdnje sutkinje su pretpostavke, impresije i „prema mom mišljenju“ konstrukcije

„Zaključci podnositeljice prijave temelje se isključivo na pretpostavci, a ne na dokazima.“
(str. 13)

Nema uzročno-posljedične veze – ni traga

„Nije bilo moguće utvrditi uzročno-posljedičnu vezu između radnji prijavljenog advokata i posljedica na koje se ukazuje.“
(str. 15)

„Općepoznatost“ ne znači ništa ako nema dokaza

„Generalizacije i ‘općepoznate činjenice’ ne mogu se smatrati dokaznim elementom.“
(str. 14)

Advokat ima pravo javno govoriti

„Sudski postupci u kojima advokat postupa predmet su interesa javnosti… medijsko izvještavanje se ne može automatizmom tumačiti kao dokaz njegovog učešća.“
(str. 14)

Indicije nisu dokazi – posebno ne ovakve „indicije“

„Indicije moraju da djeluju kao čvrst zatvoren krug… što u ovom slučaju nije ispunjeno.“
(str. 16)

Advokat ima pravo kritikovati i sudske odluke

Čak i u hipotetičkom slučaju kada bi se utvrdilo njegovo javno obraćanje ili komentarisanje predmeta u kojem postupa, neophodna bi bila detaljna analiza sadržaja izjava i načina prezentacije činjenica kako bi se procijenilo da li je obraćanje u granicama propisa ili postoji eventualno kršenje odredbi advokatskog kodeksa.

(str. 17)

Ništa u prijavi ne dotiče disciplinsku odgovornost advokata

„Ne može se tretirati kao element disciplinske odgovornosti advokata.“
(str. 18)

Zaključak koji potpisuje Komora:

„Nije pruženo dovoljno dokaza da je Mirnes Ajanović poduzeo radnje kojima bi se stekla obilježja povrede advokatske etike ili ugleda advokature.”
(dispozitiv, str. 20)

ŠTA JE OVO ZAPRAVO BILO?

Pokušaj ušutkivanja – i najbrža potvrda da advokatska komora konačno podiže glavu.

Sudije nisu iznad advokata.
Sudije nisu iznad građana.
Sudije su službena lica koja od novca građana primaju nenormalno visoke plate da bi sudile zakonito i pravedno, a ne da bi pisale prijave bez dokaza.

Kada se pročita cijelo rješenje, kada se sagledaju sve stranice – a ima ih 20 – postaje jasno:

Sutkinja Šejla Ćatić je podnijela prijavu bez ijednog dokaza – onako – možda u huji zbog pisanja Dokumentovano.ba, jer je advokat Mirnes Ajanović prijavljen zbog naših tekstova, ali još je svakako skočila na nos, jer je tada bilo samo desetak tekstova – i možda nam ne bi bila više interesantna –a sad je Šejlizam narastao na 60 tekstova a još 40 napisanih čeka objavu – dočekaće! ..i biće još, sve dok sudije ne počnu suditi po zakonima, činjenicama i dokazima, svima za sve – a prije svega obespravljeni kupci stanova Oaza Lamela B2, koji su nakon isplate stanova u cijelosti prije dvije godine, zbog Šejlizma ostavljeni u nemilisti Dženexa da ih ucjenjuje i dalje dodatnim plaćanjem – jer nama u stanove dok se ne plati koliko treba direktoru Dževadu Sakiću.

Sutkinja Šejla Ćatić je podnijela prijavu bez ijednog dokaza.
Nijednog.
Nula.
Prazna kutija.

Prijavu temelji na:

– „prema mom mišljenju“
– „jasna veza“ koju nije objasnila
– „svi znaju“ što niko nije potvrdio
– „vjerujem“
– „smatram“
– „mene targetira“

U pravosuđu se to zove: proizvoljnost.
U novinarstvu: spin.

U realnosti: pokušaj pritiska na advokata da pogne glavu …e, pa Šejla, neće moći, ne samo da je advokat nesalomiv, nego su i kupci stanova koje zastupa – nesalomivi – idu dalje i pravdu će dobiti! – ili će svi izgubiti – bez obzira na Dženeksovu „ljudskost“ da sada nudi pola od odokativnog cijelog što je tražio – u prosjeku 30.000 KM po stanu.

Šejlin je problem, ali, da se ne zaboravi, i Muhameda Tulumovića koji ju je službeno proslijedio, a i on će doći na red – što je prijava adresirana na pogrešnu adresu.

Jer Mirnes Ajanović nije neko koga je iko u ovoj državi – sudija, tužilac, ministar, inspektor, vlast bilo koje vrste – ikada uspio ušutkati.

Udariti lažno na advokata koji je javno prvi rušio – i srušio sa svima kao on – globalnu svjetsku pošast iživljavanja nad svima nama tokom „pandemije“ – kada su SVI pognuli glave i šutili u cijelom svijetu – nije baš mudro, da ne koristimo druge riječi.

NAJAVA KOJA ĆE DODATNO POTRESTI (NE)PRAVOSUĐE

Sutra objavljujemo još udarniju analizu – najvažnijeg rješenja u modernoj historiji advokature i borbe za zaštitu prava građana i pravde– koje definitivno potvrđuje:

Advokat ima pravo da brani klijente.
Advokat ima pravo da ukazuje na nezakonitosti.
Advokat ima pravo da proziva nepravdu i zloupotrebe.
Advokat ima pravo da govori.

A niko – pa ni sudija – nema pravo da ga ušutka.

Napomena: Nove činjenice o „kandidaturi“ sudije Muhameda Tulumovića u ponedjeljak!

HOW THE DISCIPLINARY COMPLAINT OF A JUDGE AGAINST ATTORNEY MIRNES AJANOVIĆ – BACKFIRED ON JUDGE ŠEJLA ĆATIĆ
Or: How an attempt to silence someone became evidence against the one who tried to silence him.

WHEN DISCREDITING BECOMES AN OWN GOAL – or as people say: when power goes to one’s head

There are complaints that carry legal weight.
There are complaints that carry moral weight.
And then there is the complaint of Judge Šejla Ćatić – which carried only one kind of weight:
– the weight of complete senselessness.

After attorney Mirnes Ajanović submitted his 58-page objection to the disciplinary complaint filed by Judge Šejla Ćatić, the Regional Bar Association of Tuzla, in its 20-page Decision No. 5-DT-031/25, clearly stated:

“THE SUBMITTED COMPLAINT IS UNFOUNDED.”

But that is not all.

This decision likely represents the strongest judicial rebuke of attempts by judges to silence attorneys in at least the last 20 years — precisely since the infamous “judicial reform” of 2003.

That is why this text carries the only appropriate title:
because the attempt to strike an attorney turned into the clearest written proof of who tried to discipline whom — and who ended up disciplined, falling flat on their face.

KEY QUOTES THAT DESTROYED ŠEJLA'S COMPLAINT

From the decision, we highlight passages that will certainly find their place in legal textbooks:

Not a single piece of evidence exists

“Not a single direct piece of evidence establishes that the reported attorney is the author of the disputed publications on social networks or online portals.”
(p. 12)

Attorney Mirnes Ajanović did not publish, share, or comment on anything

“During the verification of claims, no trace was found indicating that the reported attorney personally published, shared, or commented on the disputed content.”
(p. 12)

Seven times repeated: the judge’s claims are assumptions, impressions, and ‘in my opinion’ constructions

“The conclusions of the complainant are based solely on assumptions, not on evidence.”
(p. 13)

No causal connection — not even a trace

“It was not possible to establish any causal connection between the actions of the reported attorney and the alleged consequences.”
(p. 15)

‘General knowledge’ means nothing without evidence

“Generalizations and ‘commonly known facts’ cannot be considered evidentiary elements.”
(p. 14)

An attorney has the right to speak publicly

“Judicial proceedings in which an attorney acts are matters of public interest… media reporting cannot automatically be interpreted as proof of his participation.”
(p. 14)

Indications are not evidence — especially not these kinds of ‘indications’

“Indications must form a firm closed circle… which in this case has not been fulfilled.”
(p. 16)

An attorney has the right to criticize judicial decisions

“Even in a hypothetical scenario in which public statements or commentary by the attorney were established, a detailed analysis of the content and manner of presenting facts would be required to assess whether such statements fall within the permissible limits or constitute a potential breach of the attorney’s code of ethics.”
(p. 17)

Nothing in the complaint touches upon disciplinary liability of the attorney

“It cannot be treated as an element of the attorney’s disciplinary responsibility.”
(p. 18)

Final conclusion of the Bar Association:

“Insufficient evidence has been provided to establish that Mirnes Ajanović undertook actions that would constitute a breach of attorney ethics or the reputation of the legal profession.”
(dispositive, p. 20)

WHAT WAS THIS REALLY ABOUT?

An attempt to silence — and the fastest confirmation that the Bar Association has finally lifted its head.

Judges are not above attorneys.
Judges are not above citizens.
Judges are public officials paid with citizens’ money — excessively highly — to deliver lawful and fair judgments, not to write complaints without evidence.

Reading the entire decision — all 20 pages of it — makes one thing clear:

Judge Šejla Ćatić filed a complaint without a single piece of evidence — just like that — perhaps in a moment of anger over the reporting of Dokumentovano.ba, since attorney Mirnes Ajanović was reported because of our texts. But she also fell flat on her face, because at that time there were only about a dozen texts — and maybe we would not have been interested anymore — but now “Šejlizam” has grown to 60 texts and another 40 written waiting for publication — and they will be published! And there will be more, as long as judges refuse to judge according to laws, facts, and evidence, for everyone and everything — especially the disenfranchised buyers of apartments in Oaza Lamela B2, who, despite paying in full two years ago, have been left at the mercy of Dženex to extort additional payments — because they “cannot get their apartments until they pay whatever Director Dževad Sakić demands.”

Judge Šejla Ćatić filed a complaint without a single piece of evidence.
None.
Zero.
An empty box.

Her complaint is based on:
– “in my opinion”
– “a clear connection” she never explained
– “everybody knows,” which nobody confirmed
– “I believe”
– “I consider”
– “he targets me”

In the judiciary this is called: arbitrariness.
In journalism: spin.
In reality: an attempt to pressure an attorney into submission.
…well, Šejla, that won’t work, not only because the attorney is unbreakable, but because the apartment buyers he represents are unbreakable — they continue forward and they will get justice!
— or everyone will lose — regardless of Dženex’s “kindness” to now offer half of the arbitrarily demanded amount — on average 30,000 KM per apartment.

But Šejla’s problem is also the problem of Muhamed Tulumović, who officially forwarded her complaint — and his turn will come — because the complaint was sent to the wrong address.

Because Mirnes Ajanović is not someone whom anyone in this country — judge, prosecutor, minister, inspector, or authority of any kind — has ever managed to silence.

To attack an attorney with false allegations — an attorney who was among the first, publicly and openly, to expose and defeat the global scourge of abuses during the “pandemic,” at a time when EVERYONE bowed their heads in silence around the world — is not wise, to put it mildly.

ANNOUNCEMENT THAT WILL FURTHER SHAKE THE (IN)JUSTICE SYSTEM

Tomorrow we publish an even more striking analysis — the most important decision in the modern history of the legal profession and the fight to protect citizens’ rights and justice — which definitively confirms:

An attorney has the right to defend clients.
An attorney has the right to expose unlawful actions.
An attorney has the right to call out injustice and abuse.
An attorney has the right to speak.
And no one — not even a judge — has the right to silence him.

Note: New revelations regarding the “candidacy” of Judge Muhamed Tulumović — on Monday!

Dalje:

NASTAVAK SERIJALA — BORBA ZA PRAVDU ZA SVE GRAĐANE

Zbog ozbiljnosti podnesene kaznene prijave Federalnom tužilaštvu – POSKOK-u, odlučili smo promijeniti redoslijed ranije najavljenih tekstova. Ti tekstovi ostaju za objavu nakon objave ovih najavljenih tekstova, ili eventualno novih u zavisnosti od okolnosti razvoja događaja, ali sada fokus stavljamo na nove nastavke koji razotkrivaju pravne, institucionalne i društvene posljedice podnošenja krivične prijave protiv sudije Šejle Ćatić – kako bi se istina čula jasno i – glasno.

Ovo nije borba samo za kupce stanova u „Lameli B2“.
Ovo je borba za svakog građanina koji sutra može stajati pred sudom i tražiti zaštitu svojih prava – primjenom zakona.

Naša, i Vaša, i svih, je obaveza da se nikada više ne ponovi pravosudni apsurd kakav je izazvao „ŠEJLIZAM“.
Svaka bizarna, nelogična ili nezakonita sudska odluka biće iznesena pred sud javnosti… i POSKOK, koji je već započeo proces institucionalne provjere i istrage.

Serijal se zato nastavlja još snažnije — jer pravda nije privatna stvar, nego temelj društva.

Narednih dana:

INSTITUCIONALNI ALIBI – Kako se u Općinskom sudu u Tuzli pere odgovornost

…ako je „Pravosudni teatar“ pokazao kako se odluke režiraju, onda institucionalni alibi objašnjava kako se za te odluke – niko ne smatra odgovornim.
To je nova faza sistema: nepravda više ne treba opravdanje, dovoljno joj je da ima – sudsko-jaranski alibi…

ANATOMIJA TIŠINE – Kako se rađa institucionalna poslušnost

…svaka tišina ima svoju anatomiju.
U Tuzli, ta tišina ima organe, nervni sistem i refleks straha.
Njeno srce kuca u hodnicima gdje se odluke ne donose zbog zakona, nego zbog ravnoteže između moći i poslušnosti.
A njen nervni centar – onaj koji šalje impuls šta se može, a šta se ne smije – zove se interes…

TIHI PARTNERI – Kako kapital diktira presude i kako se stvaraju čudne sudske veze

…u Tuzli, sudska praksa odavno nije pitanje zakona – nego pitanje odnosa.
Postoje odluke koje se donose brže nego što se spis može fizički otvoriti, i odluke koje se ne donose ni nakon godina, iako su sve činjenice utvrđene.
Razlika između tih predmeta nije u pravu, već u tome ko stoji s druge strane sudskog stola…

MREŽA PODRŠKE – Kako sudije čuvaju jedna drugu i zašto se nijedna odluka ne preispituje

…pravosuđe u Tuzli više ne funkcioniše kao sistem kontrole – nego kao sistem međusobne zaštite.
U njemu se odluke ne ocjenjuju, nego održavaju, a kritika ne razmatra, nego neutralizira.
To nije greška u sistemu. To je sistem sam po sebi…

PRESUDE BEZ ODGOVORNOSTI – Kako se u Općinskomm sudu u Tuzli gubi trag pravdi

…u pravnim knjigama piše da presuda ima za cilj uspostaviti pravdu.
U Tuzli, presuda je postala – krajnja tačka odgovornosti.
Sve prije nje je izgovor, a sve poslije – tišina…

REAKCIJA I STRAH – Šta slijedi nakon što istina izađe iz suda

…postoji trenutak kada zid tišine počne pucati – ne zbog buke, nego zbog odjeka istine.
U Tuzli, taj odjek se sada čuje.
Nakon serijala Dokumentovano.ba, koji je razotkrio obrasce „Šejlizma“, mrežu zaštite u građanskom odjeljenju i povezanost s interesima Dženexa, pravosuđe više nije tiho – sada govori šapatom…

KAD SE SUD BOJI JAVNOSTI – Kako pravosuđe u Tuzli postaje zatvoren sistem pod reflektorima

…postoje institucije koje žive od povjerenja i institucije koje žive od straha.
U Tuzli, pravosuđe se već godinama održava upravo na – strahu od javnosti.
Dok bi u normalnom sistemu transparentnost bila dokaz snage, u Tuzli je ona postala simbol prijetnje.
Sudovi više ne čuvaju zakon od naroda, nego sebe od pitanja naroda…

KAD MOĆ POČNE PADATI – Kako sistem pokušava preživjeti nakon što izgubi kontrolu

…moć ne nestaje naglo. Ona prvo izgubi sigurnost, pa autoritet, a tek onda – smisao.
U Tuzli, taj proces se sada vidi jasno: pravosuđe pokušava da se ponaša kao da se ništa nije promijenilo, dok javnost već zna da ništa više nije isto…

POSLJEDNJI REFLEKS – Kako se sistem pokušava spasiti istragom protiv samog sebe

…kada institucije izgube povjerenje, njihov prvi refleks nije da traže istinu – nego da naprave iluziju da je traže.
U Tuzli, taj refleks je sada aktiviran.
Pod pritiskom javnosti, sudovi i pravosudna vijeća najavljuju „unutrašnje provjere“, „analize postupanja“ i „razmatranja odluka“.
Ali iza tih izraza ne stoji ništa osim – sistem koji sam sebe ispituje da bi se oslobodio krivnje…

KAD SE ISTINA POČNE BRANITI – Kako institucije pokušavaju diskreditovati svjedoke, novinare i advokate koji progovore

…sistem koji ne može da ospori činjenice, počinje da napada one koji su ih izgovorili.
To je faza u kojoj istina postaje optužena, a oni koji su je iznijeli – meta.
U Tuzli, to se upravo dešava…

LINIJA ODBRANE – Kako tuzlansko pravosuđe pokušava predstaviti krizu kao napad na nezavisnost

Kada institucije izgube autoritet, ne traže istinu – traže izgovor.
U Tuzli, taj izgovor je pronađen: svaki pokušaj da se govori o zloupotrebama, svaka analiza odluka, svaka medijska objava o nepravdi – sada se proglašava “napadom na nezavisnost suda”.
To je nova linija odbrane sistema koji više ne brani zakon, nego sam sebe.

SISTEMSKI KORIDORI – Kako se odluke usklađuju kroz nevidljive veze između suda, ministarstva i investitora

…tuzla više nema institucije – ima koridore moći.
Oni se ne nalaze u zakonima, nego u hodnicima, kancelarijama i telefonskim razgovorima.
To su putevi kojima se ne kreće pravda, nego interes, i to tačno onim redom kojim ide dokument – od ministarstva, do suda, do investitora…

SPREGA I MOĆ – Kako se u Tuzli formirao paralelni poredak koji odlučuje mimo zakona

…u Tuzli, zakon se i dalje piše, ali se ne primjenjuje tamo gdje bi trebalo – u Općinskom sudu u Tuzli.
Jer iznad svakog zakona, stajao je i stoji – dogovor.
Dogovor koji ima svoje aktere, svoje mehanizme, svoje tišine i svoje nagrade.
I koji, već godinama, proizvodi odluke koje liče na pravdu – ali to nisu.

PUKOTINA U ZIDU – Kako pojedinci iz sistema počinju slati poruke iznutra

…sistem se ne ruši spolja.
On se urušava iznutra – kada oni koji su ga gradili, počnu da sumnjaju u njega.
U Tuzli, ta faza je počela.
Unutar institucija koje su godinama održavale zid tišine, pojavile su se pukotine.
I kroz te pukotine sada prolazi – istina…

NASTAVAK SERIJALA

REAKCIJA SISTEMA – Kako institucije pokušavaju zataškati tragove i pronaći ‘krivca za istinu’

…kada istina počne da izlazi iz zidova, sistem ne traži način da je potvrdi – nego da je ućutka.
U Tuzli je ta faza sada u punom zamahu: pokrenute su interne kontrole, “unutrašnje provjere”, pa čak i neformalne potrage za “izvorima informacija”.
Ali umjesto da se ispita korupcija, zloupotrebe i nepravda, istrage su usmjerene na – one koji su govorili…

KAD STRAH PROMIJENI STRANU – Kako javnost počinje diktirati tempo, a institucije postaju taoci sopstvenih odluka

…strah je dugo bio oružje moći.
Ali kad se istina probije do ljudi, strah mijenja pravac.
U Tuzli, više se ne boje građani – boje se oni koji su navikli da odlučuju bez posljedica.
Sudije koje su nekada komandovale tišinom sada izbjegavaju javnost…

PAD AUTORITETA – Kada se funkcije pretvaraju u teret, a pozicije moći postaju simboli sramote

…u Tuzli, više se ne govori o moći – govori se o krizi autoriteta.
Sudije, ministri i predsjednici odjela koji su do jučer djelovali nedodirljivo, sada izbjegavaju javnost, sakrivaju se iza fraza i protokola, i pokušavaju sačuvati ono što više ne postoji – ugled bez povjerenja...

TRENUTAK ISTINE – Kada sistem više ne može pobjeći od sopstvenih odluka i počinje se suočavati s dokazima

…svaka laž ima rok trajanja.
U Tuzli, taj rok je istekao.
Odluke koje su godinama donosene iza zatvorenih vrata sada stoje na stolu – sa potpisima, pečatima i dokazima koji ne znaju za izgovore.
Sistem više ne može da bježi od svojih papira.
Došao je trenutak kada dokument postaje svjedok, a potpis – priznanje…

POSLJEDICE – Kada se sistem suoči s onim što je sam stvorio

…sistem koji je godinama oblikovao stvarnost sada se suočava sa svojom vlastitom sjenkom.
Sve što je pokušao sakriti, sada se vidi.
Sve što je pokušao relativizirati, sada ima ime, datum i dokaz.
A oni koji su mislili da mogu izbjeći odgovornost – postali su simboli onoga od čega su bježali…

NASTAVAK SERIJALA – jubilarni

ISTINA KAO PRESUDA – Kako se društvo mijenja kada istina postane trajnija od moći

…moć traje dok ima strah.
Istina traje dok ima dokaza.
A kada strah nestane, a dokazi ostanu – nastaje presuda koja ne treba sudiju.
To je ono što se upravo dešava u Tuzli: institucije još postoje, ali autoritet je preselio – u javnost…

NOVA FAZA: Obnova povjerenja i sistemska katarza – može li Tuzla ponovo povjerovati u pravdu?

…nakon svake istine dolazi tišina.
Ali to više nije ona tišina straha – nego tišina promjene.
U Tuzli, nakon godina prikrivanja, urušavanja i razotkrivanja, društvo sada stoji pred pitanjem koje se ne može izbjeći: može li se pravda obnoviti?
I ako može – ko će je graditi…

MORALNA REKONSTRUKCIJA – Kako pojedinci iz institucija pokušavaju povratiti lični integritet i povjerenje građana

…u sistemu koji je izgubio vjerodostojnost, svaka iskrena odluka postaje čin hrabrosti.
U Tuzli se počinje rađati novi fenomen: pojedinci iz institucija pokušavaju popraviti ono što institucije nisu znale čuvati – svoj ugled…

UNUTRAŠNJI OTPOR – Kako savjest postaje oblik borbe protiv sistemske korupcije

,,,postoji otpor koji se ne vidi, ali se osjeća.
Ne vodi se na ulicama, nema vođe, nema slogane.
To je otpor iznutra – otpor savjesti protiv tišine sistema.
U Tuzli, gdje je decenijama dominirala logika poslušnosti, počinje da se stvara nova mreža ljudi koji ne pristaju…

RAZOTKRIVANJE MEHANIZAMA MOĆI – Kako se korupcija u institucijama prilagođava nakon što izgubi monopol nad strahom

…korupcija nikada ne nestaje naglo – ona se prerušava.
Kada izgubi moć prijetnje, oblači odijelo saradnje.
Kada ne može ucjenjivati, počinje da se izvinjava.
Kada ne može skrivati dokumente, počinje ih tumačiti.
Tako i danas, nakon što su mehanizmi pritiska razbijeni i informacije postale javne,
korupcija pokušava da se rebrendira kao sistemska normalnost…

OPERACIJA PRANJE OBRAZA – Kako kompromitovane strukture pokušavaju kroz “reforme” spasiti sopstveni legitimitet

…kada institucije izgube moralni kredibilitet, one ne priznaju krivicu –
one organizuju reformu.
Ne zato da bi se promijenile, nego da bi preživjele.
I upravo to se danas događa u Tuzli: sistem koji je raskrinkan, sada pokušava da se „očisti“ –
ali ne istinom, nego propagandom…

KONTROLISANA TRANSPARENTNOST – Kako se istina pokušava ograničiti i dozira se kao forma institucionalnog marketinga

…u vremenu kada je istina postala prijetnja, sistem ju je pretvorio u proizvod.
Institucije više ne kriju sve – sada kriju kako se otvara.
Transparentnost je postala dekoracija, pažljivo dozirana i planski kontrolisana.
Ne da bi se građani informisali, nego da bi se javnost umirila…

FABRIKA ILUZIJA – Kako institucije proizvode privid reda dok sistem tone u moralni haos

…kada institucije više ne mogu opravdati rezultate, one počinju proizvoditi privid rada.
Statistike, izvještaji, sastanci i planovi postaju scenografija koja treba prikriti činjenicu
da sistem više ne postoji – osim kao predstava…

NASTAVAK SERIJALA

86. KULISE DRŽAVE – Kako institucije opstaju zahvaljujući percepciji moći, a ne njenoj suštini

…država više ne postoji kroz moć, nego kroz predstavu o moći.
Njene institucije djeluju, ali ne odlučuju. One sude, ali ne presuđuju.
Donose rješenja, ali ne rješavaju…
Ono što je ostalo nije sistem – to su kulise, pažljivo postavljene da bi sakrile prazninu iza njih.

POVRATAK SUŠTINE – Kako pojedinci, univerziteti i nezavisne inicijative počinju stvarati paralelni sistem vjerodostojnosti izvan formalnih institucija

…kada država izgubi autoritet, istina traži novi dom.
A kada institucije više ne proizvode povjerenje, ono se počinje rađati izvan njih.
U Tuzli, i širom Bosne i Hercegovine, polako, gotovo neprimjetno,
nastaje paralelni sistem vjerodostojnosti – sastavljen od ljudi, znanja i ideja koje više ne čekaju dozvolu da postoje…

INTELEKTUALNA OPOZICIJA – Kako akademska zajednica postaje nova moralna vertikala u društvu bez institucija

…kada institucije padnu, a moć izgubi smisao, na scenu stupaju oni koji još misle, pamte i vjeruju.
To su profesori, istraživači, pravnici i novinari – ljudi koji nemaju oružje ni funkciju, ali imaju nešto što sistem ne može oduzeti: intelektualnu hrabrost.

NOVA AKADEMSKA ETIKA – Kako znanje, istina i karakter postaju politički otpor u vremenu moralne relativizacije

Sistem koji se boji znanja, već je izgubio svaku moć.
Jer nijedna vlast ne može opstati tamo gdje su činjenice slobodne i gdje riječ profesora ima veću težinu od izborne kampanje.
Tuzla danas postaje laboratorij društvene promjene: mjesto gdje univerzitet, javna riječ i dokumentovana istina ponovo postaju osnova moralnog poretka.

RANIJE NAJAVLJENI NASTAVCI SERIJALA

Zbog ozbiljnosti podnesene krivične prijave, redoslijed ranije planiranih tekstova je pomjeren — ali ovi nastavci ostaju ključni za razumijevanje šire slike i biće objavljeni. U njima se razotkrivaju pravne, društvene i ljudske posljedice „Šejlizma“ i pravne nesigurnosti koja pogađa sve građane.
Ovo nije borba samo za kupce „Lamele B2“ — ovo je borba za sve građane koji pred sudovima traže pravdu, danas i ubuduće.

GLAS GRAĐANA: KAKO IZGLEDA SVAKODNEVNA AGONIJA KUPACA STANOVA U „LAMELI B2“

…ljudi plaćaju kredite i kirije, gube zdravlje i porodice, a još uvijek ne mogu ući u stanove koje su već platili…

CRNO NA BIJELO: DOPIS „DŽENEXA“ I ODLUKA SUTKINJE ŠEJLE ĆATIĆ!

…treći dopis „Dženexa“ od 07.07.2025. s prijetnjom sudskim troškovima gotovo se preklapa s obrazloženjem sutkinje Šejle Ćatić, otvarajući pitanje mogućeg nezakonitog uticaja…

KO PROFITIRA OD AGONIJE KUPACA?

…dok kupci gube zdravlje i dostojanstvo, jedini direktni dobitnik apsurdne odluke sudije Šejle Ćatić je „Dženex“, koji kroz prolongiranje procesa može nastaviti vršiti pritiske i ucjene…

GLAS JAVNOSTI: SLUČAJ SUDIJE ŠEJLE ĆATIĆ I „DŽENEXA“ KAO SIMBOL PRAVNE NESIGURNOSTI

…građani su zgroženi, a konkurentske građevinske firme već koriste skandal Dženexa u svojim reklamama: „Kod nas sigurno dobijate stan koji kupite!“…

SUDSKI PARADOKSI: KAKO JEDNO RJEŠENJE RUŠI POVJERENJE U SVE SUDIJE

…ako isti sud na istim dokazima i činjenicama donosi potpuno suprotne odluke, građani gube svaku vjeru da zakon vrijedi jednako za sve…

OD PRIVREMENE MJERE DO KONAČNE PRESUDE: ŠTA DALJE ČEKA KUPCE STANOVA U „LAMELI B2“

…sudbina kupaca sada zavisi od Kantonalnog, Vrhovnog suda FBiH i Ustavnog suda BiH, pa i od ESLJP, ali i od Federalnog tužilaštva – Posebnog odjela za borbu protiv korupcije i organizovanog kriminala (POSKOK)…

SVJEDOČANSTVA KUPACA: KAKO IZGLEDA ŽIVOT U PODSTANARSTVU DOK STE VEĆ PLATILI SVOJ STAN – PRIJE DVIJE GODINE?

…pred sudom su ispričane potresne priče kupaca stanova plaćenih prije dvije godine: gubitak kilograma zbog stresa, porodični sukobi, selidbe djece iz škole u školu – agonija koja nema cijenu…

…

SERIJAL SE NASTAVLJA

Serijal će se i dalje nastaviti — istina će izlaziti na vidjelo, korak po korak, sve dok se ne obezbijedi pravda za sve kupce Dženexove Oaze „Lamelae B2“, ali i za sve građane Bosne i Hercegovine koji pred sudovima traže zaštitu svojih prava …i nalete na udar “ŠEJLIZMA”.

NEXT:
CONTINUATION OF THE SERIES — A FIGHT FOR JUSTICE FOR ALL CITIZENS

Due to the seriousness of the criminal complaint submitted to the Federal Prosecutor’s Office – POSKOK, we decided to change the order of previously announced texts. Those texts remain scheduled for publication after these newly announced instalments – or possibly new ones, depending on how events unfold – but for now we focus on new continuations that expose the legal, institutional and social consequences of filing a criminal complaint against Judge Šejla Ćatić – so that the truth can be heard clearly and loudly.

This is not a fight only for the apartment buyers in “Lamela B2”.
This is a fight for every citizen who may one day stand before a court and seek protection of their rights – through the application of the law.

It is our duty – yours, ours, everyone’s – to ensure that a judicial absurdity such as the one caused by “ŠEJLISM” never happens again.

Every bizarre, illogical or unlawful court decision will be brought before the court of public opinion… and POSKOK, which has already begun the process of institutional review and investigation.

The series therefore continues even more forcefully — because justice is not a private matter, but the foundation of society.

In the coming days:

INSTITUTIONAL ALIBI – How responsibility is laundered in the Municipal Court in Tuzla
…if the “Judicial Theatre” has shown how decisions are staged, then the institutional alibi explains how no one is considered responsible for those decisions.
This is the new phase of the system: injustice no longer needs justification, it only needs a judicial-buddy alibi…
THE ANATOMY OF SILENCE – How institutional obedience is born
…every silence has its own anatomy.
In Tuzla, that silence has organs, a nervous system and a reflex of fear.
Its heart beats in corridors where decisions are not made because of the law, but because of the balance between power and obedience.
And its nerve centre – the one that sends the impulse of what is allowed and what is forbidden – is called interest…
SILENT PARTNERS – How capital dictates judgments and how strange judicial ties are created
…in Tuzla, judicial practice has long ceased to be a matter of law – it has become a matter of relationships.
There are cases decided faster than the file can physically be opened, and cases that are not decided even after years, although all the facts are established.
The difference between those cases is not in the law, but in who stands on the other side of the bench…
THE SUPPORT NETWORK – How judges protect each other and why no decision is ever re-examined
…the judiciary in Tuzla no longer functions as a system of control – but as a system of mutual protection.
Decisions are not evaluated, they are maintained, and criticism is not considered, it is neutralised.
This is not a glitch in the system. This is the system…
JUDGMENTS WITHOUT RESPONSIBILITY – How the trace of justice disappears in the Municipal Court in Tuzla
…legal textbooks say that a judgment aims to establish justice.
In Tuzla, a judgment has become the final point of responsibility.
Everything before it is an excuse, and everything after it – silence…
REACTION AND FEAR – What happens after the truth leaves the courthouse
…there is a moment when the wall of silence starts to crack – not because of noise, but because of the echo of truth.
In Tuzla, that echo is now being heard.
After the Dokumentovano.ba series, which exposed the patterns of “Šejlism”, the protection network in the Civil Division and its connection with Dženex’s interests, the judiciary is no longer silent – now it speaks in whispers…
WHEN THE COURT FEARS THE PUBLIC – How the judiciary in Tuzla becomes a closed system under the spotlight
…there are institutions that live off trust and institutions that live off fear.
In Tuzla, the judiciary has for years survived precisely on the fear of the public.
While in a normal system transparency would be proof of strength, in Tuzla it has become a symbol of threat.
Courts no longer protect the law from the people, but protect themselves from the people’s questions…
WHEN POWER STARTS TO FALL – How the system tries to survive after losing control
…power does not disappear suddenly. First it loses certainty, then authority, and only then – meaning.
In Tuzla, this process is now clearly visible: the judiciary is trying to behave as if nothing has changed, while the public already knows that nothing is the same anymore…
THE LAST REFLEX – How the system tries to save itself by investigating itself
…when institutions lose public trust, their first reflex is not to seek the truth – but to create the illusion that they are seeking it.
In Tuzla, that reflex is now active.
Under public pressure, courts and judicial councils announce “internal reviews”, “analyses of conduct” and “consideration of decisions”.
But behind those phrases there is nothing but a system that examines itself only to absolve itself…
WHEN THE TRUTH STARTS TO DEFEND ITSELF – How institutions try to discredit witnesses, journalists and attorneys who speak out
…a system that cannot refute the facts starts to attack those who voiced them.
This is the phase in which truth becomes the accused, and those who have presented it – the target.
In Tuzla, that is exactly what is happening right now…
THE LINE OF DEFENCE – How the Tuzla judiciary tries to present crisis as an attack on independence
When institutions lose authority, they do not seek truth – they seek an excuse.
In Tuzla, that excuse has been found: every attempt to talk about abuses, every analysis of decisions, every media report on injustice – is now labelled as “an attack on the independence of the court”.
This is the new line of defence of a system that no longer defends the law, but only itself.
SYSTEMIC CORRIDORS – How decisions are aligned through invisible links between the court, the ministry and the investor
…Tuzla no longer has institutions – it has corridors of power.
They are not written in the laws, but in hallways, offices and phone calls.
These are the paths along which not justice moves, but interest, in exactly the same order in which the document travels – from the ministry, to the court, to the investor…
COLLUSION AND POWER – How a parallel order was formed in Tuzla that decides outside the law
…in Tuzla, the law is still written, but it is not applied where it should be – in the Municipal Court in Tuzla.
Because above every law, there stood – and still stands – a deal.
A deal that has its actors, its mechanisms, its silences and its rewards.
And which, for years now, has been producing decisions that resemble justice – but are not.
A CRACK IN THE WALL – How individuals from within the system start sending messages from inside
…the system does not collapse from the outside.
It collapses from within – when those who built it begin to doubt it.
In Tuzla, that phase has begun.
Within the institutions that for years maintained the wall of silence, cracks have appeared.
And through those cracks, something is now coming out – the truth…
CONTINUATION OF THE SERIES
THE REACTION OF THE SYSTEM – How institutions try to cover up the traces and find ‘the culprit for the truth’
…when truth starts to seep out of the walls, the system does not look for ways to confirm it – but ways to silence it.
In Tuzla, this phase is now in full swing: internal controls have been launched, “internal reviews”, and even informal hunts for “sources of information”.
But instead of investigating corruption, abuse and injustice, the investigations are directed at – those who spoke…
WHEN FEAR CHANGES SIDES – How the public starts dictating the pace and institutions become hostages of their own decisions
…fear was long the weapon of power.
But when truth reaches the people, fear changes direction.
In Tuzla, it is no longer the citizens who are afraid – it is those who are used to making decisions without consequences.
Judges who once commanded silence now avoid the public…
THE FALL OF AUTHORITY – When positions turn into burden and power roles become symbols of shame
…in Tuzla, no one talks about power anymore – they talk about a crisis of authority.
Judges, ministers and heads of divisions who until yesterday appeared untouchable now avoid the public, hide behind phrases and protocols, and try to preserve something that no longer exists – prestige without trust…
THE MOMENT OF TRUTH – When the system can no longer escape from its own decisions and begins to confront the evidence
…every lie has an expiration date.
In Tuzla, that date has passed.
Decisions that were for years made behind closed doors now lie on the table – with signatures, seals and evidence that do not recognise excuses.
The system can no longer run from its own papers.
The moment has come when the document becomes a witness, and the signature – a confession…
CONSEQUENCES – When the system faces what it has created itself
…a system that has shaped reality for years is now confronted with its own shadow.
Everything it tried to hide is now visible.
Everything it tried to relativise now has a name, a date and proof.
And those who thought they could evade responsibility have become symbols of what they were running from…
CONTINUATION OF THE SERIES – JUBILEE
TRUTH AS A JUDGMENT – How society changes when truth outlasts power
…power lasts as long as there is fear.
Truth lasts as long as there is evidence.
And when fear disappears and evidence remains – a judgment is born that does not need a judge.
This is what is happening now in Tuzla: institutions still exist, but authority has moved – into the public…
A NEW PHASE: Restoring trust and systemic catharsis – can Tuzla believe in justice again?
…after every truth comes silence.
But this is no longer the silence of fear – it is the silence of change.
In Tuzla, after years of concealment, collapse and exposure, society now stands before a question that cannot be avoided: can justice be restored?
And if it can – who will build it…
MORAL RECONSTRUCTION – How individuals from within institutions try to regain personal integrity and public trust
…in a system that has lost credibility, every honest decision becomes an act of courage.
In Tuzla, a new phenomenon is emerging: individuals within institutions are trying to repair what the institutions themselves failed to protect – their reputation…
INTERNAL RESISTANCE – How conscience becomes a form of struggle against systemic corruption
…there is a resistance that cannot be seen, but can be felt.
It is not fought on the streets, it has no leaders, no slogans.
It is an inner resistance – the resistance of conscience against the silence of the system.
In Tuzla, where the logic of obedience has dominated for decades, a new network of people who refuse to comply is beginning to form…
EXPOSING THE MECHANISMS OF POWER – How institutional corruption adapts after losing its monopoly over fear
…corruption never disappears suddenly – it disguises itself.
When it loses the power of intimidation, it puts on the suit of cooperation.
When it can no longer blackmail, it starts to apologise.
When it can no longer hide documents, it starts to interpret them.
Thus, today – after pressure mechanisms have been broken and information has become public –
corruption tries to rebrand itself as systemic normality…
OPERATION FACE-WASHING – How compromised structures try to save their own legitimacy through “reforms”
…when institutions lose moral credibility, they do not admit guilt –
they organise reform.
Not in order to change, but in order to survive.
And that is exactly what is happening today in Tuzla: a system that has been exposed now tries to “clean itself” –
not with truth, but with propaganda…
CONTROLLED TRANSPARENCY – How truth is limited and dosed as a form of institutional marketing
…in times when truth has become a threat, the system has turned it into a product.
Institutions no longer hide everything – now they hide how things are being opened.
Transparency has become decoration, carefully measured and strategically controlled.
Not to inform citizens, but to pacify the public…
THE FACTORY OF ILLUSIONS – How institutions produce an illusion of order while the system sinks into moral chaos
…when institutions can no longer justify their results, they start producing the appearance of work.
Statistics, reports, meetings and plans become a stage set designed to hide the fact
that the system no longer exists – except as a performance…

CONTINUATION OF THE SERIES

THE STATE’S SCENERY – How institutions survive thanks to the perception of power, not its substance
…the state no longer exists through power, but through the appearance of power.
Its institutions operate, but do not decide. They judge, but do not deliver justice.
They issue decisions, but do not resolve anything…
What remains is not a system – it is scenery, carefully arranged to cover the emptiness behind it.
RETURN TO ESSENCE – How individuals, universities and independent initiatives create a parallel system of credibility outside formal institutions
…when the state loses authority, truth seeks a new home.
And when institutions no longer produce trust, it begins to emerge outside them.
In Tuzla, and throughout Bosnia and Herzegovina, slowly and almost imperceptibly,
a parallel system of credibility is emerging – made up of people, knowledge and ideas that no longer wait for permission to exist…
INTELLECTUAL OPPOSITION – How the academic community becomes a new moral pillar in a society without institutions
…when institutions fall and power loses meaning, those who still think, remember and believe step onto the stage.
These are professors, researchers, lawyers and journalists – people who have no weapons and no office, but possess something the system cannot take away: intellectual courage.
A NEW ACADEMIC ETHICS – How knowledge, truth and character become political resistance in times of moral relativisation
A system that fears knowledge has already lost all power.
Because no authority can survive where facts are free and where the word of a professor weighs more than an election campaign.
Tuzla today is becoming a laboratory of social change: a place where the university, the public word and documented truth once again become the foundation of moral order.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED CONTINUATIONS OF THE SERIES

Due to the seriousness of the submitted criminal complaint, the order of previously planned texts has been shifted — but these continuations remain crucial for understanding the broader picture and will be published. They expose the legal, social and human consequences of “Šejlism” and the legal insecurity that affects all citizens.

This is not a fight only for the buyers of “Lamela B2” — this is a fight for all citizens who seek justice before the courts, now and in the future.

THE VOICE OF CITIZENS: WHAT THE EVERYDAY AGONY OF APARTMENT BUYERS IN “LAMELA B2” LOOKS LIKE
…people pay loans and rent, lose their health and families, and still cannot move into the apartments they have already paid for…
IN BLACK AND WHITE: THE “DŽENEX” LETTER AND THE DECISION OF JUDGE ŠEJLA ĆATIĆ!
…the third letter from “Dženex” of 07.07.2025 with a threat of court costs almost overlaps with the reasoning of Judge Šejla Ćatić, raising the question of possible unlawful influence…
WHO PROFITS FROM THE BUYERS’ AGONY?
…while buyers lose health and dignity, the only direct beneficiary of Judge Šejla Ćatić’s absurd decision is “Dženex”, which, by prolonging the process, can continue to exert pressure and blackmail…
THE VOICE OF THE PUBLIC: THE CASE OF JUDGE ŠEJLA ĆATIĆ AND “DŽENEX” AS A SYMBOL OF LEGAL INSECURITY
…citizens are appalled, and competing construction companies are already using the Dženex scandal in their advertising: “With us you certainly get the apartment you buy!”…
JUDICIAL PARADOXES: HOW ONE RULING DESTROYS TRUST IN ALL JUDGES
…if the same court, on the same evidence and facts, renders completely opposite decisions, citizens lose all faith that the law applies equally to everyone…
FROM INTERIM MEASURE TO FINAL JUDGMENT: WHAT AWAITS THE APARTMENT BUYERS IN “LAMELA B2”
…the fate of the buyers now depends on the Cantonal Court, the Supreme Court of FBiH and the Constitutional Court of BiH, and even the ECtHR – as well as on the Federal Prosecutor’s Office, the Special Department for the Fight against Corruption and Organised Crime (POSKOK)…
TESTIMONIES OF BUYERS: WHAT LIFE LOOKS LIKE IN RENTAL WHILE YOU HAVE ALREADY PAID FOR YOUR APARTMENT – TWO YEARS AGO
…before the court, buyers recounted harrowing stories about apartments paid two years ago: weight loss due to stress, family conflicts, children being moved from school to school – an agony beyond price…

…

THE SERIES CONTINUES

The series will continue — the truth will keep coming to light, step by step, until justice is secured for all buyers of Dženex’s “Oasis – Lamela B2”, and for all citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina who seek protection of their rights before the courts… and run into the blow of “ŠEJLISM”.

VEZANI TEKSTOVI:

Prenosimo: Da li je sudija Šejla Ćatić donijela najskandalozniju sudsku odluku u historiji pravosuđa?

PRAVOSUDNA AGONIJA: SLUČAJ SUDIJE ŠEJLE ĆATIĆ I DŽENEXA – OD PLAĆENIH STANOVA DO IZGUBLJENOG POVJERENJA U SUDSTVO

ŠEJLINA PRESUDA POD LUPOM: UMJESTO VJEROVATNOSTI – PREVARENIM KUPCIMA TRAŽENO DOKAZIVANJE, ALI ZATO SUDIJA ĆATIĆ VJERUJE DŽENEXU NA RIJEČ

ČLAN 272. ZPP FBiH CRNO NA BIJELO: ZAŠTO JE SUTKINJA ŠEJLA ĆATIĆ IGNORISALA MJERU KOJU ZAKON IZRIČITO PROPISUJE?

ŠEJLIZAM – NOVI TERMIN ZA PRAVOSUDNI APSURD

PRAVNA (NE)SIGURNOST NA (NE)DJELU: DVIJE SUPROTNE ODLUKE ISTOG SUDA – ŠTA KAŽE EVROPSKI SUD ZA LJUDSKA PRAVA?

PRAVA NA IMOVINU POD UDAROM SUDIJE ŠEJLE ĆATIĆ: KAKO ODBIJANJE MJERE OSIGURANJA KRŠI EVROPSKU KONVENCIJU O LJUDSKIM PRAVIMA

FEDERALNOM TUŽILAŠTVU DOSTAVLJENA KRIVIČNA PRIJAVA PROTIV SUDIJE ŠEJLE ĆATIĆ: O SUDSKOM SKANDALU ODLUČIĆE POSKOK

„ŠEJLIZAM“ POD ISTRAGOM: DETALJI PRIJAVE POSKOK-u OTKRIVAJU OZBILJNE SUMNJE U NEZAKONITO POSTUPANJE

PRAVOSUDNA DŽUNGLA – KAD GRAĐANI IZGUBE POVJERENJE U SUDSTVO: ŠTA OSTANE OD DRŽAVE?

PRIJAVA POSKOK-u: TEST ISTINE ZA PRAVOSUĐE I INSTITUCIJE