PRIČE

DA LI TE JE SRAMOTA – SUTKINJO SVETLANA

21 Decembra, 2025

(kad sudija prijavi istinu, a sud se zaklinje u transparentnost)

(ovaj nastavak se dostavlja VSTV BiH, POSKOK-u, Tužilaštvu BiH, ambasadama u BiH, svim međunarodnim organizacijama i svim domaćim i međunarodnim medijima)

Piše: Danijel Senkić / Dokumentovano.ba

I dalje pišem ovaj feljton u prvom licu, jer sam se direktno uvjerio – KO NAM SUDI.
Gledao.
Slušao.
Svjedočio.

I, nakon svega – imam, danas, samo jedno pitanje:

Da li te je, sutkinjo Svetlana Stevanović, bar malo sramota?

Jer hajde da ogolimo stvar do kraja – bez fraza, bez rukavica, bez sudske šminke.

DISCIPLINSKA PRIJAVA ZBOG – JAVNOG SUDSKOG RJEŠENJA

Sudija Svetlana Stevanović disciplinski prijavljuje advokata Mirnesa Ajanovića.

Ne zato što je vrijeđao.
Ne zato što je lagao.
Ne zato što je prijetio.

Nego zato što je objavio njeno sudsko rješenje.

JAVNO.

POTPISANO.

OVJERENO PEČATOM.

SLUŽBENO.

I sad dolazi ono ključno:

to isto rješenje je Kantonalni sud u Tuzli – ne jednom, nego DVA PUTA – jer je Svetlana bila neposlušna pa ponovila – poništio kao NEZAKONITO.

Dva puta.

Dakle, sudija:

donese rješenje,
Kantonalni sud ga poništi,
ponovo donese gotovo isto,
Kantonalni sud ga opet poništi,
i onda – prijavi advokata jer je javnost VIDJELA šta je radila.

Ako ovo nije – budi Bog s nama – ja ne znam šta jeste.

A ONDA ROČIŠTE – I PANIKA ZBOG TRANSPARENTNOSTI

Na disciplinskom ročištu sudija Svetlana:

ispituje mene,
ispituje još dva svjedoka,

ali ne o suštini.

Ne o zakonitosti.

Ne o tome zašto joj nezakonite odluke padaju na Kantonalnom sudu.

Nego opsesivno pita jedno jedino pitanje:

“Odakle vam moja disciplinska prijava protiv Mirnesa?”

Ponavlja.
Insistira.
Vrpolji se.
Traži krivca što je prijava – procurila.

A zna vrlo dobro da je:

prijava dio postupka,
javnost ima pravo znati,

a posebno kada se prijava koristi kao instrument pritiska sudije na advokata.

To se, sutkinjo Svetlano, zove ubijanje transparentnosti.

A SAD – ŠAMAR SVETLANI IZ SOPSTVENE KUĆE

I sad dolazimo do dijela koji je, iskreno, tragično komičan.

Dok sudija Svetlana prijavljuje advokata jer je javnost vidjela njeno rješenje,
v.d. predsjednica Općinskog suda u Tuzli, dr. sci. Alvira Selimović Halilčević, na zvaničnoj web stranici suda piše:

„Sudske odluke ne treba da budu samo donesene, već i da budu dostupne i vidljive svima kojima pravda pripada.“

I još:

„Naša je obaveza da transparentnim radom doprinesemo vladavini prava i očuvanju povjerenja javnosti.“

Link: https://opsud-tuzla.pravosudje.ba/vstvfo/B/32/kategorije-vijesti/5998/6006/6020

Pa sad, sutkinjo Svetlana, da te pitam direktno: Je li ovo laž suda ili si ti izuzetak iz sopstvene institucije?

Jer ti radiš TAČNO SUPROTNO SUDU.

Ti:

hoćeš da kažnjavaš vidljivost sudskih odluka,
progoniš objavu – transparentnost rada suda,
sataniziraš javnost – medije,
i neosnovano kriviš advokata jer se istina – vidi.

A USPUT – KRIVIČNA ISTRAGA, DA SE NE ZABORAVI

Dok se baviš time ko je kome šta pokazao,
da te podsjetim (a i javnost):

protiv tebe se vode KRIVIČNI PREDMETI.

Ne tračevi.
Ne samo feljtoni.

Nego predmeti:

Kantonalno tužilaštvo TK – T03 0 KTAK 0122323 24,
a potom ustupljeni POSKOK-u – predmet T 21 0 KT 000483 25.

Dakle:

dok prijavljuješ advokata zbog objave papira – tvog (nezakonitog) javnog rješenja,
tužilaštvo čita tvoje ODLUKE.

I ne pita se:
“Ko je ovo objavio?”
nego:
“Zašto si i pored upute Kantonalnog suda ponovo sudila nezakonito?”

To je razlika.

ZAKLJUČAK – BEZ IMALO ŠMINKANJA

Zato ponavljam pitanje, glasno i javno:

Da li te je bar malo sramota, sutkinjo Svetlana?

što progoniš transparentnost suda,
što prijavljuješ istinu,
što se baviš posljedicom, a ne uzrokom,
što se braniš disciplinom, a ne pravom,
i što pokušavaš ušutkati ono što ti se vraća iz Kantonalnog suda – pečatom NEZAKONITO.

Jer jedno je sigurno:

Pravda se danas vidi više nego ikad.
I nećeš je više moći sakriti – ni prijavama, ni pitanjima, ni nervozom.

A feljton?

On ide dalje.

Jer kad sudija ratuje protiv transparentnosti rada suda,
jedino što preostaje jeste –
još više tekstova svjetla u Svetlaninom pravosudnom mraku.

ARE YOU ASHAMED AT ALL – JUDGE SVETLANA
(when a judge reports the truth, and the court swears by transparency)

(This addendum is being submitted to the High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council of Bosnia and Herzegovina (HJPC BiH), the Special Department for the Suppression of Corruption, Organized and Inter-Cantonal Crime (POSKOK), the Prosecutor’s Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina, embassies in Bosnia and Herzegovina, all relevant international organizations, and all domestic and international media.)

THE COURT AND ME – Svetlana Stevanović
Serial
Written by: Danijel Senkić / Dokumentovano.ba
(this installment is delivered to the HJPC of BiH, POSKOK, the Prosecutor’s Office of BiH, embassies in BiH, all international organizations, and all domestic and international media)

I continue to write this serial in the first person, because I have directly seen for myself—WHO JUDGES US.
I watched.
I listened.
I witnessed.
And after everything—today I have only one question:
Are you at least a little ashamed, Judge Svetlana Stevanović?

Because let’s strip this down to the core—no phrases, no gloves, no judicial makeup.

A DISCIPLINARY COMPLAINT BECAUSE OF A PUBLIC COURT RULING

Judge Svetlana Stevanović filed a disciplinary complaint against attorney Mirnes Ajanović.
Not because he insulted anyone.
Not because he lied.
Not because he threatened anyone.
But because he published her court ruling.
PUBLICLY.
SIGNED.
STAMPED.
OFFICIAL.

And now comes the crucial part:
that very ruling was annulled by the Cantonal Court in Tuzla—not once, but TWICE—because Svetlana was disobedient and repeated it—as UNLAWFUL.
Twice.

So, the judge:

issues a ruling,
the Cantonal Court annuls it,
issues almost the same ruling again,
the Cantonal Court annuls it again,
and then—files a complaint against the attorney because the public SAW what she did.

If this isn’t—God help us—I don’t know what is.

THEN THE HEARING—AND PANIC OVER TRANSPARENCY

At the disciplinary hearing, Judge Svetlana:
• questions me,
• questions two more witnesses,
but not about the substance.
Not about legality.
Not about why her unlawful decisions keep falling at the Cantonal Court.

Instead, she obsessively asks one single question:
“How did you obtain my disciplinary complaint against Mirnes?”

She repeats it.
Insists.
Fidgets.
Looks for the culprit because the complaint—leaked.

And she knows very well that:
• the complaint is part of a proceeding,
• the public has the right to know,
especially when a complaint is used as an instrument of pressure by a judge against an attorney.

That, Judge Svetlana, is called killing transparency.

NOW—A SLAP FROM SVETLANA’S OWN HOUSE

And now we reach the part that is, frankly, tragically comic.

While Judge Svetlana reports an attorney because the public saw her ruling,
the Acting President of the Municipal Court in Tuzla, Dr. Sci. Alvira Selimović Halilčević, writes on the court’s official website:

“Court decisions should not only be rendered, but also be accessible and visible to all to whom justice belongs.”

And further:

“It is our duty, through transparent work, to contribute to the rule of law and preserve public trust.”

So now, Judge Svetlana, let me ask you directly:
Is this a lie of the court—or are you an exception within your own institution?

Because you act EXACTLY OPPOSITE to the court.

You:
• want to punish the visibility of court decisions,
• persecute publication—court transparency,
• demonize the public and the media,
• and baselessly blame an attorney because the truth—is visible.

AND BY THE WAY—A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION, LEST WE FORGET

While you are busy with who showed what to whom,
let me remind you (and the public):

CRIMINAL CASES are being conducted against you.
Not gossip.
Not just serials.
But cases:

Cantonal Prosecutor’s Office of Tuzla Canton – T03 0 KTAK 0122323 24,
• then transferred to POSKOK – case T 21 0 KT 000483 25.

So:
• while you report an attorney for publishing a paper—your (unlawful) public ruling,
• prosecutors are reading your DECISIONS.

And they are not asking:
“Who published this?”
but rather:
“Why did you, despite the instructions of the Cantonal Court, rule unlawfully again?”

That is the difference.

CONCLUSION—WITHOUT ANY MAKEUP

That is why I repeat the question, loudly and publicly:
Are you at least a little ashamed, Judge Svetlana?

for persecuting court transparency,
• for reporting the truth,
• for dealing with the consequence instead of the cause,
• for defending yourself with discipline rather than with law,
• and for trying to silence what keeps returning from the Cantonal Court—stamped UNLAWFUL.

Because one thing is certain:
Justice today is more visible than ever.
And you will no longer be able to hide it—neither with complaints, nor with questions, nor with nervousness.

And the serial?
It goes on.

Because when a judge wages war against the transparency of the court’s work,
the only thing left is—
even more texts of light in Svetlana’s judicial darkness.

Vezani tekstovi:

Urednik Dokumentovano.ba i sutkinja Svetlana Stevanović na službenom dejtu. Provodadžija – Regionalna advokatska komora Tuzla

UVOD U FELJTON: SUD I JA – Svetlana Stevanović

POČETAK KRAJA SUDSKOG NASILJA NAD PRAVOM NA SLOBODU GOVORA

LAŽE LI SUDIJA – ILI ADVOKAT?

KO NAM SUDI? – SVJEDOČENJE KAO UPOZORENJE!

PRIZOR PONAŠANJA SUDIJE S ROČIŠTA KOJI TREBA UĆI U UDŽBENIKE – ALI POD RUBRIKU: UPOZORENJE, NE METOD!

SUDIJA KOJA PRIJAVLJUJE NEISTINU A NA ROČIŠTU NE PITA ŠTA JE NETAČNO – OTKRIVA STRAH OD ISTINE

MENE NE INTERESUJE DANIJEL – SAMO ME INTERESUJE MIRNES

„JE L’ SE OVAKO I SUDI, SVETLANA?“

NIJE JE ADVOKAT MIRNES PONIZIO – SUDIJA SVETLANA JE PONIZILA SAMU SEBE!

SUD I JA – EPIZODA: „DA SMO OBJAVILI SLIKU SUTKINJE SVETLANE, BI LI SAMA SEBE PRIJAVILA?“